Published on:
Updated on:
No, that would not be very normal. It is much more common to be on a consistent safe dosing of Testosterone constantly & a lower dose of HCG semi-constantly if active fertility in the near future is a... See Full Answer
They are fine ways to improve your Testosterone level, though each has some drawbacks. Enclomiphene isn't going to help someone with very low T & primary hypogonadism as much as someone with relative ... See Full Answer
hCG mono therapy can be a viable alternative to TRT, though there are a few limitations. The first, and arguably the most important problem with it is that hCG is now very expensive. It is the most ex... See Full Answer
At AlphaMD, we're here to help. Feel free to ask us any question you would like about TRT, medical weightloss, ED, or other topics related to men's health. Or take a moment to browse through our past questions.
These two get discussed as though they were interchangeable options on the same menu, distinguished mainly by preference.
They work differently, and the difference matters most if you are young or if having children is a possibility for you.
Neither of them is a product to select. Both are prescription medical treatments, and whether either is appropriate is a determination for an independent licensed medical provider following evaluation.
Here is what separates them.
It acts on the same receptor in the testicles that luteinizing hormone does.
Luteinizing hormone is the signal the brain sends telling the testicles to produce testosterone. HCG acts at that same point, which means it is asking your own body to make more rather than supplying any from outside.
That is a genuinely different mechanism from replacement, and it is worth understanding even if it never turns out to be relevant to you.
That depends on what your testicles can still do, and it varies considerably from person to person.
This is the part most often skipped. A treatment that works by asking the body to produce more is limited by the body's remaining capacity to produce it. Where that capacity is reduced, the request has less to act on.
It is also why this class of approach cannot be evaluated from how you feel. The relevant question is about underlying capacity, and that is a clinical question rather than an experiential one.
It supplies testosterone from outside the body, which makes it more predictable.
Predictability is a real advantage. A supplied amount does not depend on what the testicles can still produce, so the response is less variable between individuals than it is with an approach that works through the body's own production.
There is a second effect, and it is the important one. Supplying testosterone from outside tells the brain to stop sending its own signal, and when that signal stops, the testosterone level inside the testicles drops.
Because sperm production depends on it.
The concentration of testosterone inside the testicles is a different thing from the level measured in your blood, and the two do not move together in the way most people assume. That distinction is the whole reason this subject is more complicated than it looks.
This is why fertility is the question that separates these two approaches, rather than one consideration among several.
Raise it before treatment begins rather than after.
If you and a partner are planning to have children, or think you might at some point, that belongs in the conversation with a licensed provider at the outset. It is a subject that can be discussed usefully in advance and considerably less usefully in retrospect.
A licensed provider needs to know your fertility intentions in order to advise on what is appropriate for you. Without that information, an important input to the decision is simply missing.
Then there is a step worth taking before the treatment comparison, and it is the step most often skipped.
If you are young and you have symptoms, the useful question is why. Symptoms in a younger man are a reason to investigate rather than a reason to select a treatment, and what the investigation finds can change what belongs on the table in the first place.
Starting from "which of these two should I take" assumes the answer to a question that has not been asked yet. A licensed provider working through the underlying cause is doing the part that determines whether either option is relevant.
These are two different mechanisms answering two different questions. Which question applies to you is the thing worth establishing first.
At AlphaMD, we're here to help. Feel free to ask us any question you would like about TRT, medical weightloss, ED, or other topics related to men's health. Or take a moment to browse through our past questions.
No, that would not be very normal. It is much more common to be on a consistent safe dosing of Testosterone constantly & a lower dose of HCG semi-constantly if active fertility in the near future is a... See Full Answer
They are fine ways to improve your Testosterone level, though each has some drawbacks. Enclomiphene isn't going to help someone with very low T & primary hypogonadism as much as someone with relative ... See Full Answer
hCG mono therapy can be a viable alternative to TRT, though there are a few limitations. The first, and arguably the most important problem with it is that hCG is now very expensive. It is the most ex... See Full Answer
Enter your email address now to receive $30 off your first month’s cost, other discounts, and additional information about TRT.
This website is a repository of publicly available information and is not intended to form a physician-patient relationship with any individual. The content of this website is for informational purposes only. The information presented on this website is not intended to take the place of your personal physician's advice and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Discuss this information with your own physician or healthcare provider to determine what is right for you. All information is intended for your general knowledge only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for specific medical conditions. The information contained herein is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge. The information should not be considered complete and should not be used in place of a visit, phone or telemedicine call, consultation or advice of your physician or other healthcare provider. Only a qualified physician in your state can determine if you qualify for and should undertake treatment.